|
Nikon AF-S 600/4G ED VR is the most extreme telephoto lens I have ever used. The lens is very fast and precise, despite its size, and delivers high quality images. As a wildlife photographer the 600mm lens is my most often used lens, accounting for more than half of all my shots. The lens is quite heavy, weighing in at 5 kg, so it's necessary to use a solid tripod with a fluid video head. A close focusing distance of 5 meters is very good for a 600mm lens.
The lens has the "Nano Crystal Coat" which is much more than just a fancy name. The specially coated lens elements means that in practical photography, I can shoot backlit situations with great results. This is a big advantage for me, because I usually prefer to shoot my subjects with backlighting. Shooting almost directly toward the sun the lens provides little or no distracting flares, in addition to fast and precise focusing. To be honest, this is one of the features I've appreciated best after my transition to Nikon!
The lens also has the latest generation of VR technology for image stabilization. This system works much better than expected and is a blessing when I'm shooting at slow shutter speeds. This summer I was very surprised, because earlier I was used to shooting at 1/1600 sec to get sharp images with my 600mm lens on the vibrating metal deck of our tour ship. This year I actually managed to get sharp shots even at 1/250 second shutter speed with VR set to "Normal". Usually I put the VR on "Tripod" when I have the lens on a tripod, but with all the vibrations in the boat the VR "normal" setting worked surprisingly well. Actually I discovered this «by accident», but it helped me to achieve sharp images even in low light conditions.
I want to stress a point with the VR-system: Don´t activate the VR with shutter speeds at 1/1000 or faster, because this can make your images blurry even when your camera is stopped down a few f-stops. I only use VR when my shutter speed is 1/500 or slower!
So which telephoto lens should you choose? This is a good question that I should be careful to answer, but for my photography I´m very happy with the 600/4.0. The main reason for this is that with 600/4.0 I get both great sharpness, super fast AF and deliciously blurred backgrounds. I have also tested the 400/2.8 and the 500/4.0, but I have concluded that the 600/4.0 is the right lens for me. If you are a keen photographer of birds, wild animals or racing, this is the perfect lens in my opinion, if you don´t have problems with the price or weight. I have always carried my 600/4.0 as hand luggage (in my Lowepro CompuTrekker) on planes, so in my case the weight and size are not a problem.
|
Absolutely beautiful images! Awesome lens and camera reviews. Man, this is great site…. I see you have some workshops… The one in March is for 9150. How much is that in $? And what does it include. I assume we'll be crashing over at your place, with good whisky…. and talk about photography, right? No? Lonely in a hotel? ;-) Seriously, let me know Ole. Thanks
Gregory.
Thanks, Gregory
The eagle workshop costs NOK 9150,- which is USD $1525
It include everything (hides, boat, “hotel”, food, teaching) exept your wiskey (or other drinks). You will not be lonely!!
This place is highly recommended and is one of the best places for bird photography in Northern Europe.
Ole Jørgen
Hello Ole, my name is Octavio Passos i'm from Portugal and i'm a photojournalist, i change my gear CANON for NIKON, i buy the d3s 14-24, 24-70 and 70-200 and now i'm realy confused if i buy the 400 2.8 or 600 4!?!?!?
Now i used a nikon 300 2.8 II a friend lent me the lens for work while i don't decide if i buy the 400 2.8 or 600 4… and i shoot very sports events, professional Portuguese footbal league and many other events… and for me 300 2.8 the image is too far… i need more zoom especially in football games!!
When I have Canon I had CANON EOS 1D MARK III 1.3 image factor crop … and used the Canon EF 400 2.8 L IS USM… and the zoom's is suficent that ok!!!
Now my biggest doubt is the quality image of Nikon 400 2.8 for the Nikon 600 4… Some friends tell me the Nikon 400 2.8 have best image quality, what do you say about this!?!? you have used the 400,500 and 600 and do you think the image quality 400 for 600 ???
Thanks for everything,
and sorry for my english!!
Cheers big Hug ,
Octavio Passos
Hi Octavio
I love the Nikon 600/4.0 ! It is perfect for wildlife photography (especially birds) and the image quality and AF-speed is great. I prefer the 600/4 before 500/4 and 400/2.8 for my work and assignments. For football and other sports the 400/2.8 is maybe the best, but with the D3S you don´t get the crop-factor as you had with the 1D cameras. Again 600/4.0 gives you top image quality, also when you shoot in backlight…
Thanks Ole,
yeah i think i will buy the 600mm f/4 i think is the best for me!!!
My friend good shots and big hug thanks for everything!!
Hi Ole,
Beautiful photos, and excellent homepage, I have a 600 mm aswell and was surprised to read that you can fit the 600mm VR into the computrekker backpack? is that correct? I have the pro trekker 600 and is considering a Guru Kiboko backpack, as the pro trekker is too large for carry-on luggage.
thanks Benjamin